Back

In Chapter VIII, Principle 5 of the document, the principle of retrieval as a test to learn is discussed. The author refers to various studies and sources to support this principle.

The first source mentioned is a book called “The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan” by Robert Kanigel. This source is not directly related to the principle of retrieval as a test to learn but is mentioned in passing.

The second source is a study titled “Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping” by Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Janell R. Blunt. This study compares the effectiveness of retrieval practice and elaborative studying with concept mapping. The results show that retrieval practice leads to better learning outcomes compared to concept mapping.

The third source mentioned is a study by Henry L. Roediger III and Jeffrey D. Karpicke titled “The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.” This study explores the benefits of testing memory as a learning strategy. The authors argue that testing can improve long-term retention and enhance learning.

The fourth source is a study by Jeffrey D. Karpicke titled “Metacognitive Control and Strategy Selection: Deciding to Practice Retrieval During Learning.” This study focuses on metacognitive control and strategy selection in relation to retrieval practice. The findings suggest that students who actively engage in retrieval practice during learning demonstrate better metacognitive control and strategy selection.

The fifth source mentioned is a book chapter by Robert A. Bjork titled “Memory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings.” This chapter discusses the role of memory and metamemory in human learning. It emphasizes the importance of understanding one’s own memory processes and using effective learning strategies.

The sixth source is a study by Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Henry L. Roediger III titled “Expanding Retrieval Practice Promotes Short-Term Retention, but Equally Spaced Retrieval Enhances Long-Term Retention.” This study examines the effects of expanding and equally spaced retrieval practice on retention. The findings suggest that expanding retrieval practice leads to better short-term retention, while equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.

The seventh source mentioned is a study by Herbert F. Spitzer titled “Studies in Retention.” This study investigates the effects of delaying tests on retention. The results indicate that delaying the first test can improve long-term retention.

The eighth source is a doctoral dissertation by Chunliang Yang titled “Enhancing Learning and Retrieval: The Forward Testing Effect.” This dissertation explores the forward testing effect, which refers to the benefits of testing as a learning strategy. The findings suggest that forward testing can enhance learning and retrieval processes.

Based on the information provided in the document, it can be inferred that retrieval as a test to learn is a powerful learning strategy. It involves actively recalling information from memory, which enhances retention and improves learning outcomes. Multiple studies and sources support the effectiveness of retrieval practice in both short-term and long-term learning. Additionally, understanding one’s own memory processes and employing effective learning strategies, such as retrieval practice, can further enhance learning.

Words: 509